Archive for March, 2008

NPR Looks at Polaroid

Sunday, March 2nd, 2008

If you're new here, you may want to subscribe to my RSS feed. Thanks for visiting!

For someone who hasn’t taken a Polaroid in ages, I’m surprising myself by how much I’m reading (and writing) about their decision to abandon instant film. A couple days ago, NPR had a story on All Things Considered about the end of the Polaroid, interviewing none other than the legendary Chuck Close, who reveals that every picture he’s ever taken (practically) has been a Polaroid, and every painting he’s ever made has been made from a Polaroid. Close sums the situation up pretty well. “I don’t know what the hell I’m going to do,” he says.

For a second they talk to some idiot from Polaroid who says that the company’s goal is to focus on bringing the “magic of Polaroid” to digital photography, perhaps with some kind of super potrable photo printer, as if anyone would have that much of a use for one. I immediately think of all the ink I would fly through if I printed every digital picture I snapped without thinking; it sounds to me that Polaroid has something of a fundamental misunderstanding of what digital photography is all about.

The greatest irony of all this though, hinted at but not really explored in the NPR story, is that the onset of digital pushed Polaroid out of the realm of mass consumption and into the domain of the artist. Instead of cornering a niche market with a stable (albeit small) amount of demand, Polaroid would rather chase after the opportunity they missed a decade by attempting to apply an obsolete business model to a whole new world– digital photography isn’t just a change in technology, it’s also a change in the way people think about pictures. Now, having thoroughly missed the boat, Polaroid will sink its life raft as well.

31 Under 31

Saturday, March 1st, 2008

So I just tried to go see 31 Under 31, and the line to get in was literally around the block. It’s freezing, so I didnt have it in me to tough it out, but I have to see this tonight so now that I’m warm and made my other stop, I’m going to brave the elements and try again. But Jesus. So Many people!

Update: I managed to get into the show at about 11:00 pm and it was great. A serious scene, packed with people but I managed to find Amy and Alana’s work amid the chaos.

Great Polaroiders

Saturday, March 1st, 2008

roids01.jpg
© Greg Wasserstrom

For a lot of us, Polaroids were like a gateway drug that developed into more serious photography-abuse. Above are the first images I made that ignited my interest in photography in March 2001, almost 7 years ago.

In light of Polaroid’s recent discontinuation of instant film, I thought I’d compile a list of Polaroid collections from some of history’s greatest photographers. There are far more of these instances and projects than I reasonably include here. Also, I only really know the obvious ones, anyway. Please expand the list with your links and descriptions in the comments.


51hxkxtdknl_aa240_.jpgWALKER EVANS: POLAROIDS

Evans pioneering work of the ’30s and ’40s made photography a particularly American mode of social exploration for much of the 20th century. There is nary a photographer to follow that could escape his influence. Evans was one of the very first photographers to begin experimenting with the Polaroid in the early 1970s. The company was so thrilled by this living legend’s interest in their product, they quickly offered him an unlimited supply of SX-70 film. Today, a similar offer would yield a stock that would last only through 2009.

31vg6g9ttvl_bo2204203200_pilitb-dp-500-arrowtopright45-64_ou01_aa240_sh20_.jpg
ROBERT MAPPLETHORPE: AUTOPORTRAIT

From the book jacket: “The black-and-white Polaroid photographs that Mapplethrope produced during the early 1970s constitute an in-depth self-portrait, intently and graphically exploring expressions, moods, postures and actions that range from angelics and innocent to sinister and erotic. Comprised of Mapplethorpe’s earliest photographs, Autoportrait presents the artist’s most revealing attempts to wed the erotic and sexual with other theoretical concerns.

41-7dm9vpxl_aa240_.jpgROBERT MAPPLETHORPE: POLAROIDS

The reason I’m doing Mapplethorpe twice is to emphasize not only his influence on contemporary photography but also to make the point that Polaroids were an important part of his process and his use of the medium in and of itself was not without influence. This collection of black-and-white polaroids from the 1970s shows Mapplethrope making portraits of his closest friends and lovers and his immediate surroundings. His use of Polaroid add to the spontaniaty, immediacy and intamacy of the work which has had, without question, unmeasurable impact on later photographers like Nan Goldin.

41t8-i3e6l_aa240_.jpgANDRE KERTESZ: POLAROIDS

In 1979, among increasing attention to an international appreciation for his work, Kertesz began to experiment with the SX-70. Many seem to agree that the exploration of this new medium had much to do with a search for a new way of working after the death of his wife. Or, at least that’s what it says on the book jacket and in the Wikipedia.

wegman.jpg

WILLIAM WEGMAN

It’s fair to say I’m not Wegman’s biggest fan, nor would I consider him a “master photographer” comparable to the three previous ones. But as a prolific producer of massive, crystal clear Polaroid portraits of his, dogs– generally dressed adorably as people– it wouldn’t be right to leave him off the list. So there you have it. Wegman’s been using Polaroids to photograph his Weimaraners, first Man Ray and now Fay Ray, since the 1980s. He’s also the only photographer on this list to appear on Sesame Street.

419bqnnx5dl_aa240_.jpgANDREY TARKOVSKY: INSTANT LIGHT

Tarkovsky isn’t exactly a master photographer; he is the Russian director responsible for the film Solaris (the orignal mind you, not the one with George Clooney) who also snapped Polaroids in his spare time. I think the same is true for Stanley Kubrick too, though I have to say that at this point I’m not that inclined to investigate. But the wonderful thing about Polaroid is that for a person with an eye, like, say, an internationally acclaimed filmmaker, can take rich, complex pictures without having to understand the the technical working of a non-instant camera. Not that Tarkovsky was a beginner, but you get my point. I found this book in a used bookstore long ago, and it’s great.

So there it is. I know there are many, many more and please share them in the comments.