Jay-​​Z vs. the Sample Trolls

62.jpg

This is a fas­ci­nat­ing arti­cle from Slate about a seri­ous prob­lem fac­ing emcees these days: the Sam­ple Troll. What is a sam­ple troll, you ask? From the article:

Sim­i­lar to its cousins the patent trolls, Bridge­port and com­pa­nies like it hold port­fo­lios of old rights (some­times accu­mu­lated in dubi­ous fash­ion) and use law­suits to extort money from suc­cess­ful music artists for rou­tine sam­pling, no mat­ter how min­i­mal or unno­tice­able. The sam­ple trolls have already lever­aged their posi­tion into mil­lions in set­tle­ments and court dam­ages, but that’s not the real prob­lem. The trolls are turn­ing copy­right into the foe rather than the friend of musi­cal innovation.

The arti­cle is long, but it really is worth read­ing. There’s an audio ver­sion of it float­ing around some­where, too.

This trolling thing is seri­ous busi­ness. I hadn’t heard of the sam­ple trolls before, but I remem­ber read­ing an arti­cle in the New Yorker about a patent trolling com­pany that was tak­ing down RIM, the com­pany that devel­oped the Black­Berry. They had patented a crude wire­less email sys­tem that is sort of like RIM’s, and they were suing them for like a gajil­lion dol­lars. It was going to totally sink the com­pany but then of course Microsoft bought them out and solved the problem.

This arti­cle only relates only periph­er­ally to what I just said. It’s inter­est­ing though, because unlike the New Yorker arti­cle, it gives sug­ges­tions about how the music indus­try might address the sam­ple troll threat. I hope to see some lively dis­cus­sion about this here, assum­ing that any­one is read­ing this. Post com­ments if you’re out there! Let’s make this a back and forth!